Introduction
History
of the DNA-related frequency method
The origins of the DNA-related frequency method are now more than
25 years old. During 1997-1999, Charlene Boehm explored the work of
Royal Rife and other researchers who had investigated the use of
frequencies or resonance in efforts to influence pathogens. After
months of looking at various biophysical and harmonic relationships -
especially in relation to pathogen DNA – a pattern was discovered
that seemed to hold particular potential for further investigation.
Radio antennas transmit or absorb best in the presence of
wavelengths that correspond in some way to their length. A DNA
molecule can react in a similar way if an electromagnetic wavelength
is matched to the physical length of the molecule. It is subsequently
possible to compute a frequency which corresponds to that
wavelength.
A paper detailing those biophysical and mathematical relationships
was released by the author in August 1999. Soon thereafter, a U.S.
patent application was submitted on the method. After a lengthy
examination process, a patent was granted on October 9, 2007 (U.S.
7,280,874).
After the 1999 paper was written, it was discovered that the concept of
DNA molecules exhibiting resonant characteristics was not an entirely
new idea. The early 1980s saw considerable interest in this area of
biophysics, as evidenced by several scientific papers from those years
(1-4). While exact details regarding how electromagnetic frequency
emissions might influence a DNA molecule are not yet fully
understood, it is thought there may be an interaction of the emission’s
wavelength with the DNA strand or its immediate surrounding
environment.
References
1. Van Zandt LL, Kohli M, Prohofsky EW. Absorption of Microwave
Radiation by DNA double helix in aquo. Biopolymers 21(7):1465-1468
(Jul 1982).
v2. Swicord ML, Edwards GS, Sagripanti GL, Davis CC. Chain-Length-
Dependent Microwave Absorption of DNA. Biopolymers 22(12):2513-
2516 (Dec 1983).
3. Edwards GS, Davis CC, Saffer JD, Swicord ML. Resonant
Microwave Absorption of Selected DNA Molecules. Physical Review
Letters 53(13):1284-1287 (Sep 1984).
4. Edwards GS, Davis CC, Saffer JD, Swicord ML. Microwave-Field-
Driven Acoustic-Modes in DNA. Biophysical Journal 47:799-807 (Jun
1985).
Keep in mind
In nature, microorganisms are in a continual state of adaptation to,
and with their surroundings. These adaptations are partly reflected in
their DNA, which will change to a greater or lesser extent with time.
Because the frequencies in this publication are based on the length of
DNA molecules, they should be considered a “snapshot” at the time
the DNA information was accessed.
Certain pathogens show a much higher propensity for DNA genome
length variation than others. A few examples include the bacteria
Borrelia burgdorferi, Escherichia coli, certain Staphylococci and
Streptococci; and some viruses, including HIV and Hepatitis C virus.
When full genome lengths of any single organism are significantly or
even wildly variant, it can subsequently produce hundreds of
frequencies. I have in such instances abandoned the use of genome-
related frequencies. Running such a large number of frequencies is
time consuming and impractical.
Thus, automated data-mining of genome information from molecular
biology databanks is not used in the preparation of these frequency
sets. That type of effort can produce irrelevant data, and may have
diminished practical returns for the end user.
Common names of pathogens as well as old genus/species names,
alternate names, and synonyms are included in the listing to the best
of my ability. Many of those names are also cross-referenced in the
list.
Due to rapid advances in DNA sequencing technology in the past 20
years, many pathogens have been renamed (especially fungal
organisms), and that will continue into the future.
Fungal organisms may have unfamiliar genus/species names; all
fungi therefore include a “fungal organism” designation.
Parasitic organisms in many cases will have a common name
included, if one is available.
Basic suggestions for use of the frequency sets
The frequency sets in any one section are listed in alphabetical order
using the organisms' genus and species names.
All frequencies in this document are given in Hz (hertz), in the
frequency range 700-1400 Hz.
The frequencies should be run in the order they are given in the set,
reading the lines from left to right as if reading a book.
Sweeps of frequencies (especially wide ones) should not be used
unless specifically suggested in the set, as it could constitute a waste
of time and effort.
It is not in the scope of this document to suggest actual run times, due
to variations in operation and output of frequency-emitting devices.
Running multiple DNA-related frequencies at the same time is
discouraged. On some devices, running more than one frequency at a
time may result in lower power output for any single number. It may
also create mixing of signals within the body in a manner not helpful
for the intended purpose.
In the instance of use during an acute infection event (for example,
with respiratory viruses or some bacteria), it may be helpful to move
through the entire set of numbers as efficiently as possible. One may
want to initially decrease the usual amount of time spent on each
number, and then once the complete set is finished run the entire set
again in the same manner – or perhaps even a third time depending
on the situation and the pathogen.
If one is unsure which frequency set to choose for a situation, try the
following options depending on the situation: 1) try to find out the
name of a prevalent circulating pathogen; 2) use a good search engine
with search terms as specific as possible; 3) search my webpages
“Diseases and Their Pathogens”. The links for those webpages are:
Finally, epidemiological research reveals increasing instances of
zoonotic pathogen transmission in emerging diseases. Such
transmission events occur between animals and humans, as well as
between closely-related or unrelated animal species. While I have
attempted to deal with this situation by inclusion of certain frequency
sets in both the human and animal lists, obviously this is a develping
phenomenon that will require more attention in the future. If you do
not find a frequency set in the human list and you suspect zoonotic
transmission, consider checking the animal list for any possibility.
Charlene Boehm
March, 2024